Behind The Scenes Of An “Offer Night” In Toronto

Business

13 minute read

March 1, 2021

Does the public want to read the following?

Hell yes.

Does organized real estate want this floating around out there?

Probably not.

While I’m fairly certain that I won’t wake up one morning with a horse’s head in my bed, I am always concerned that, someday, I’ll write something on TRB that will put my real estate license at risk.  I’ve been writing blogs now for almost fourteen years, and although I’ve only ever had two RECO complaints in that time, I’m aware that organized real estate is watching.

I don’t know about the other agents out there, but I fear organized real estate.  Even though “they” are essentially an extension of us, it sure doesn’t feel like it.   Let’s say you’ve got 60,000 members of an organization that form a board, and that board has duly-elected leadership.  Certainly, that leadership works for the membership, right?

Not in our world.

But by the same token, if you took a petition with 28,000,000 Canadians’ signatures to the Prime Minister’s office, and said you wanted change, do you really think that change would be granted?  If you do, you’re an idealist.  And naive.

In organized real estate, we have the Toronto Regional Real Estate Board, who are responsible for the “data” that has been the subject of much legal debate over the last decade, but who also provide access to listings for their members in Toronto.

Then, we have the Real Estate Council of Ontario, who are responsible for licensing and discipline.

The reason why I can’t show you a sale from MLS without blacking out the identifiable features (address, location, MLS#, etc) is because TRREB won’t allow us to publish sale data, but it’s also because RECO has rules against “unauthorized advertising,” and believe it or not, to show another brokerage’s listing without permission and credit is not allowed, even though it’s on every third-party website out there.  More to the point, if I said anything negative whatsoever, I would be guilty of “disparaging a competitor’s listing.”

But with every blog I write here on TRB, I know that the Real Estate Council of Ontario could drop the hammer on me by using one of their many vague sections in the Code of Ethics.

Case in point:

Fairness, honesty, etc.
3. A registrant shall treat every person the registrant deals with in the course of a trade in real estate fairly, honestly and with integrity.  O. Reg. 580/05, s. 3.

Or how about this one:

Unprofessional conduct, etc.
39. A registrant shall not, in the course of trading in real estate, engage in any act or omission that, having regard to all of the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded as disgraceful, dishonourable, unprofessional or unbecoming a registrant.  O. Reg. 580/05, s. 39.

 

Over fourteen years, it should come as no surprise that I have written blog posts that people didn’t like.  But not liking them, and there being a reason why I shouldn’t be able to write them, are two different stories!  So when the time comes for a complaint to be lodged, those sections of the “Code of Ethics” above are what must be relied upon.

I mean, if I write a blog about the behind the scenes action on an offer night, does that mean I am not dealing with integrity?

And who defines what is “unbecoming a registrant?”

The hypocrisy is incredible.

With every blog post that I write, I empower the consumer with education and insight that they cannot find anywhere else, and yet I live in fear that organized real estate will crush me for it one day.

Oh well.  It’s not going to stop the following…

I’ve always wanted to take the TRB readers behind the scenes of an “offer night.”

One of my colleagues who is now, quite sadly, with another real estate brokerage, sat in my office one day when she first started to see how the whole show goes down.  In fact, I’ve done this with a couple of agents since then, and I always thought it would entertaining, informative, and a little fun to have the TRB readers sit in on an offer night as well.

Unfortunately, to video record me in my office for six hours would amount to “NSFW” as the acronym goes, and you can’t imagine the amount of coffee that’s consumed or new swear-words that are created.  So, here’s the next best thing: let me re-trace my steps from a recent offer night.

As noted above, I can’t divulge the address of the property because TRREB rules prohibit me from giving out the sale price of my own goddam listing.

The property in question was a 2-bed, 2-bath condo in a building that has been very hard to price over the years!

At 850 square feet, with a great layout, lots of windows, and loads of sunshine, I felt we would do well with this unit.

My clients completely vacated and moved into their new home, and I told them to take EVERYTHING with them!  Get out, take your stuff with you, and leave me the key.  We cleaned, painted, and repaired where needed, then fully staged the unit and took some incredible photos and virtual tour.

We listed for $699,900 and set an offer date for six days later.

The previous sale for a 2-bed, 2-bath in the building was 1,000 square feet for $825,000, or $825/sqft as the math suggests.  This would put our value right around $700,000, but I felt we would do a much better job marketing the unit, and that our unit had some nicer features, notably the southwest view and the corner with windows.

Here are the need-to-know stats:

72 showings

16 agents asked for a copy of the “status certificate”

1 unsuccessful bully offer attempt

I tell my clients that a rudimentary measure of potential interest on offer night is to divide the requests for the status certificate, or in the case of a house – the home inspection, in half, and that’s how many offers you might expect.

In the case of this particular condo, I felt that I would end up with more than eight offers, if we’re being honest here.

The feedback through the six days on the market was somewhat mixed, but that’s to be expected in this market.  I received some very odd phone calls from agents, some of which I touched on last week in my blog about bully offers.

One agent called me and said, “You’re a bit rich on the price, what do you think the level of flexibility is on the price?”

Was he wrong to ask this?  Based on the comparable sales, you could suggest that he wasn’t.  And if he’s “doing his job,” as so many buyers love to suggest, then maybe he was negotiating!

In any event, I had a few agents tell me that the price was too high, and I had a lot of agents tell me they were “having trouble pricing it,” which is often a nice way of asking what price we were expecting.  Some of these people, however, were just being honest.  Prices in this building can range from $750/sqft to $900/sqft.

Offer day arrived, and I told my clients the same thing I tell all clients on offer night:

Today is going to be a long day.  We will have multiple offers on this property and we will sell it by the end of the night, but we have ten hours between then and now.  Agents usually don’t register their offers until closer to 7pm, so if we have zero registered offers by 4pm, don’t panic.

That last part would prove to be foreshadowing, of course.  While I always register my buyer’s offer at 9:30am, not every agent works the same way.

Throughout the day, I received phone calls from twenty-one different agents.  Most of these agents asked the same question: “What are you expecting tonight?”

Many of these agents wanted to know the price I was expecting, which of course, I didn’t answer, but also wanted to know the amount of offers I was expecting, to which I said, “I would be shocked if we didn’t have six or eight.”

From 9am to 4pm, it was crickets.

How would you handle this, as an agent?

For me, it’s just par for the course.  The calm before the storm…

4:04pm: The first agent sends in Form 801 to register her offer and sends a copy of the bank draft as well.

4:07pm: An agent emails with a list of questions from the buyer’s lawyer, most of which, to be honest, were quite silly.  I responded and said that while I would love to help, the property management office was closed, and we were reviewing offers in three hours.  I couldn’t be more honest than that.

5: 30pm: An agent emails a fully-signed offer, which is quite odd, since offers were being presented at 7pm, and there was only one competing offer at this point.  That offer was for $740,000, with a $30,000 deposit, and had this note from the agent:

Here is my client’s offer. No conditions other than just a quick Status review by the Lawyer

I’m trying to think of a parallel here.

Telling your wife, “Honey, I didn’t sleep with a single stripper on Jim’s bachelor party!  Except for that one stripper…”

You either have a conditional offer, or you don’t.  The way this was phrased was amusing!

In any event, this represents our second offer.

6:20pm: A third agent is in the mix, and this agent doesn’t register, but rather sends a signed-offer as well.  This offer is for $725,000 with a $36,000 deposit, no conditions, and a bank draft attached.

6:22pm: Another agent registers an offer through our online system.  This represents our fourth offer.

6:24pm: Another agent sends an offer through.  I have never heard from, or spoken to this agent.  This offer is for $700,000 with a $35,000 deposit and no conditions.

Take a moment here to digest this: the property is listed at $699,900, there’s an offer date set, and already three offers have been registered.

This agent submitted an offer the list price, in competition.

Why?

In any event, this is our fifth offer.

6:26pm: Yet another agent emails an offer without, a) registering, b) waiting until 7pm so he knows how many offers he’s competing against!  More on this later, in greater detail…

This is our sixth offer.

The offer is for $730,000 with a $34,000 deposit and no conditions.

6:42pm: Another agent sends over a signed offer, without registering, and without speaking to me.  This is our seventh offer and is for $751,500 with a $50,000 deposit but is conditional for five business days on financing.

The agent included three conditions in the offer: inspection, financing, and status certificate.  But he crossed out two of them.  This is an old tactic to try and add by subtracting.  Often when the negotiation is really about money, you’ll see a buyer agent include four clauses and cross them all out as if to say, “See here?  We were going to have all these conditions, but we removed them,” hoping that the seller will feel lucky and then ease up on the price.

In any event, a conditional offer on an offer night, in competition, is never going to fly.

6:43pm: Another agent registers an offer.  It’s nice to see this agent do it properly!  This is our eighth offer.

6:46pm: A ninth offer is registered.

We’re cutting it a little close here, no?

Couldn’t these agents have registered an hour ago?

What do you tell the agent who registered at 4:04pm?  Or the agent who already sent in his offer a half-hour ago?

6:51pm: The agent who registered first emails me to say that based on the eight offers now registered, she’s having her client increase the price, and I’ll have the offer shortly.

6:51pm: A tenth agent registers her offer.

6:52pm: An agent emails me a signed offer and this is our eleventh offer.  This offer looks exceptional: $791,000 with a $50,000 deposit cheque herewith.

This offer is going to be the big winner tonight, no question about it.

Ironically, this is from the agent who emailed all those questions earlier tonight.

Oh, wait a minute……….this offer is conditional.  Uh-oh…

7:00pm: The clock strikes.

Is this it?

Where are all the offers?

7:01pm: The agent with the tenth offer sends hers in: it’s for $720,000 with a $40,000 deposit, no bank draft.

7:02pm: The agent with the eighth offer emails his offer.

He starts his email with the following:

Before you discount our offer right off…”

Not the best way to begin, is it?

Well, he explained that they signed this offer when there were only four registered, but this plays into what I’ll explain later, about how a buyer agent should proceed on an offer night.  Again, more on this in a bit…

I know this agent, he’s been around for a while.  Nice guy, hard-working, and although he didn’t have the winning hand, he didn’t stop playing the game.

The offer was for $721,500, with a $40,000 deposit including a bank draft, and was conditional on financing.  That’s a death sentence right there, in competition, but it didn’t stop him from trying!  He wrote two paragraphs about his clients, explained their financing situation, and then even followed up twenty minutes later with a copy of their pre-approval from the bank!

7:03pm: The agent with the fourth registered offer emails her offer in.  Actually, her assistant emails it.

The offer is for $720,000 with a $36,000 deposit, and a letter to the sellers.

The offer is conditional on financing and insurance.

Insurance?

Insurance.

Bizarre.

Let’s not even bother trying to make sense of this one…

7:06pm: The agent with the first registered offer sends her offer in for $755,000 with a $35,000 deposit, no conditions, and a bank draft attached.

This represents our highest unconditional offer to this point.

7:08pm: The agent with the ninth registered offer sends his offer in for $765,000 with a $50,000 deposit, also no conditions, also with a bank draft attached.

It seems to me: the agents who waited until they know exactly how many offers there were have the best offers.

7:30pm: Amazingly, an agent I have not heard from emails an offer thirty minutes after offers were due, meaning we could have already accepted one twenty-nine minutes before he sent his in.  This is our twelfth offer and it is for $750,000 with a $50,000 deposit and no conditions.

So let’s review.  Here are the offers we have in hand:

$700,000
$720,000
$720,000, conditional on financing and insurance
$721,500, conditional on financing
$725,000
$730,000
$740,000, “only one small condition on status…”
$750,000
$751,500, conditional on financing
$755,000
$765,000
$791,000, conditional on status

Alright.

Now what?

For those of you who thought that my comment about the real estate industry not liking this post was about providing the terms and conditions of my twelve offers, that’s not all I was talking about.

In terms of what I can do next, as the listing agent, now that I have twelve offers – what can I do?

Whatever I want.

There are no “rules” per se.  Other than the one stipulation that a listing agent cannot divulge the terms and conditions of a competing offer to another agent, there is no set, identifiable set of rules, or pattern, or accepted principles on how to deal with twelve offers once they’re in hand.

That’s what the public may not want to hear, but it’s the truth.

And while some agents will argue that I’m wrong, they know I’m not.

A colleague of mine served on the RECO Complaints & Enforcement board and I asked her very simply, “What’s to stop me from picking the third-highest out of nine offers and telling them to improve to a certain amount of money?”

She said, “You can’t.”

I said, “Why?”

She answered, “You go back to one, you go back to them all.”

I said, “Where is that explained?  Where is it written?  What Act, or Code?”

She paused, looked at me a little fishy and said, “It’s just what you should do.”

Ah-ha!

“It’s just what you should do.”

You can’t trust real estate agents with that monumental task!

I had an offer not too long ago on a listing that belonged to one of those radio ad/billboard guys.  He had forty offers on the house and he called me and said, “We’re sending ’em all back.”

All forty.

He didn’t work with the top two, or five.  He didn’t tell the losers who offered the list price, and were 30% lower than some other offers, to go home to their families.  He just sent ’em all back.

Personally, I think that backfires.  If I’m sent back with EVERYBODY else, I’m less inclined to increase my offer than if I’m told I’m in the top-three.  But I digress…

So, on the topic of ethics, fairness, working for your seller, and hypocrisy.

Yes, hypocrisy.

Because now is the time when just about everybody says, “You should take the highest offer!  None of this ‘sending people back’ nonsense.”

Only, when it’s your turn as the seller, you wouldn’t have the same attitude.

Trust me on this.  I don’t care how good a person you want to seem on this message board – no seller has ever said to me, “We have enough money, fair is fair, let’s just accept the best offer and not talk to anybody else.”

Now let’s take a quick step back for a moment.  Remember I said I would “explain later?”

If you’re a buyer, you want to register your offer first thing in the morning.  The “Offer Summary Document” merely contains your signature, and nothing else.  No price, no deposit, no terms, no conditions.  Nothing but your intention of submitting an offer that night.

Once your offer is registered, you would (presuming the listing brokerage is in tune with 2021…) recieve an update any time an offer is registered.

Ergo, as offers come in, you’re kept informed.  And as the day goes on, you understand the level of competition you would expect.

So what happens to those agents who email offers in at 6:45pm, wihtout having registered previously?

They don’t know the lay of the land.

They are flying blind.

They are submitting an offer on the property with partial information, at best.  And they are way, way too early.

A good agent will register first thing in the morning, and sign the offer (usually just filling in the price) at 6:59pm.

Of my twelve offers, only five of those agents registered their offers.

If you’re a buyer, or a new buyer-agent, take note.

So, returning to our story about sitting with twelve offers, ranging from a bizarre offer of the list price, all the way to $91,000 over list.  Since many agents submit offers without knowing how many buyers they’re competing against, when I receive their offer, I usually inform them as to how many offers there are, and then ask, “Do you want me to present this to my client?”  I’m doing this so that they can’t complain later on that they didn’t know there were eleven offers, instead of four, even though it’s their fault.  Sometimes, agents will proactively improve.  In this case, none did.

I called my clients and told them what we had.

They were over-the-moon about the $791,000, but understood that there was no way they’d accept a conditional offer.

Why?

Too risky.

What if that condition doesn’t firm up?  Then what?  Then you’re back on the market, stigmatized, and your whole plan goes up in smoke.  Ask for further clarification if you want, but trust me on this – very few, if any, agents will disagree.

The first thing I did was go to the agent with the $791,000 offer and ask, “Can you remove the condition?”

This buyer’s lawyer was costing the buyer a property, noting that the parking spot’s legal description was not the same as the actual description, among other objections (this is the case in about half of all parking spots, FYI), and I gave this agent the chance to firm up the offer.

No dice.

So I went back to the agent with the $765,000 offer and said, “The door is open here if you want to walk through it.  Your buyer would have to make a huge jump.”

Now here’s the question you want to ask: what am I allowed to tell that agent?

The answer: anything outside of the terms/conditions of a competing offer.

Can I tell that agent, “If you bring me $793,000, the property is yours”?

Yes.

Can I tell that agent, “If you bring me $1,000,000, the property is yours?”

Yes.  Although I’m just proving a point here.

The agent asked, “How much?”  but I merely told him, “A lot.”

He came back once and asked, “Would $780,000 do it?” and I told him that it would not.

He eventually was able to read the tea leaves, and called me with good news: his clients were going to re-submit at $800,000.

Great!

Except that he said now they would need to insert a condition on financing.

No dice.

He bandied about for a while, made a few calls, and then told me he wasn’t having any luck.  So I was honest with him: I said that if he wasn’t going to come in unconditional, I would open the door for another agent.

Fair, right?

Is that unfair in any way?

Would the agent at $720,000 walk through that $800,000 door?

No.

But the truth is, I would open the door for other agents, and try a few windows as well.  If he wasn’t able to re-submit with an acceptable offer, then I would look for other options.

To his credit, he came around.  The unconditional offer for $800,000 was re-submitted, and it was signed by my seller-clients.

Then I made that agent drive to my office at 10pm to drop off the deposit cheque, because I don’t sell listings without cheques.  Ever.

For the record, I did speak to the agents who had offers of around $750,000, just to say I did.  But when they’re saying things like, “I probably getcha ‘nother five grand,” it’s not worth pursuing.  When you’ve already backed the lead horse, you don’t need to keep an eye on those at the back of the pack.  These aren’t “slow starters;” they’re horses that are only in the race to fill out the field.

I let the other agents know that we had accepted another offer, and that was that.

My seller-clients were happy, and I was pleased as well.

So, comments?  Questions?  Discussion points?

Ah, yes.  I’m sure there will be many.

Just remember what I said: none of you would keep the same attitude out there as a buyer that you would as a seller.  It’s simply impossible.

I’m ready for your suggestions about how this all “should” work, or how the system should be automated and run by the government, as well as your thoughts on how “the Australian system is better,” even though you don’t know anything about it, but merely read a headline six months ago on the sidebar of a TMZ article you were reading.

Go ahead, I’ve heard it all.

Now I have to get ready for “offer night” again at 7pm on Monday…

Written By David Fleming

David Fleming is the author of Toronto Realty Blog, founded in 2007. He combined his passion for writing and real estate to create a space for honest information and two-way communication in a complex and dynamic market. David is a licensed Broker and the Broker of Record for Bosley – Toronto Realty Group

Find Out More About David Read More Posts

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

60 Comments

  1. Paully

    at 8:13 am

    Amazing story to read David! Thanks for sharing!

  2. Jenn

    at 8:20 am

    Actually one of your best posts ever!

    I would love some reasoning into why a buyer would offer the posted listing price when their up against eleven other people? Like what’s the thought process there??

  3. Sirgruper

    at 8:33 am

    David

    You often stress about having the deposit cheque in hand. If one of the offers were unconditional but a bit lower in price but with a $200,000.00 deposit would it effect your decision making?

    1. David Fleming

      at 11:34 am

      @ Sirgruper

      Good question.

      As a listing agent, I could care less about the amount of the deposit once it’s at or over 5%. If somebody has a $5,000 deposit, yes, it raises concerns. But for an $800,000 condo, if a buyer has an $800,000 offer with a $40,000 cheque, and another buyer has a $799,000 offer with a $200,000 cheque, I’d take the $800K offer without question.

      Why?

      Because the buyer gets interest on the deposit, so what does it matter to the seller?

      A larger deposit gives the seller “peace of mind” but in the event the transaction doesn’t close, that deposit is held in trust pending the outcome of litigation. It’s not like on TV where “funds in Escrow” south of the border, will automatically go into the pocket of the seller if the transaction doesn’t close.

      Now, as for “cheque in hand,” that’s another story.

      I don’t care about the amount of the deposit so much. But deposit in hand? Yes! I have to get that bank draft, otherwise, I merely have ten pieces of paper, and no consideration for the deal. If the buyer changes his mind the next morning, then I’m out of luck. Yes, the seller can sue. But nobody does.

      1. Tak Loo

        at 7:07 am

        What’s the history of 5% deposit and the thinking behind it? For example, why is it not 10 or 2 or tiered based on price?

        1. Appraiser

          at 8:56 am

          A substantial deposit implies the financial wherewithal to complete the transaction as agreed.

          In the U.S. it is sometimes called an earnest money or good faith deposit.

          Bigger is better for the seller. A sometimes powerful negotiating tool in multiple offer situations.

          1. Santi

            at 8:04 pm

            This is gold, thanks

  4. Nick

    at 8:40 am

    Great read. I used to find that night exciting! It messed with my anxiety but once it was over and had won I felt amazing!

  5. Condodweller

    at 9:00 am

    Good transparent writeup David, thanks for sticking your neck out for us.

    Unfortunately though it’s an opportunity missed for me as I was looking forward to the justification on why a seller should accept a lower offer to avoid a conditional one. I know from past blogs that you think 5-10k lower is no problem for an unconditional offer.

    Nicely done getting the second offer to go above the unconditional one, which BTW is totally fair IMO as it is a valid offer even though you would not entertain it.

    I do wonder however what the gap has to be before you say to yourself it’s too much to ignore and how do you explain to your client that he/she should leave $xxxxx on the table?

    I mean what if the next offer only came up $6k? $20k is not an insignificant amount.

    1. Marty

      at 10:05 am

      I have some of the same thoughts here too.

      A blanket policy on not accepting conditional offers seems like it might leave money on the table – often maybe.

      1. Dave

        at 2:42 pm

        It’s the old bird in the hand theory. Do you really want to be waiting 5 days for the lawyer to “give his blessing”? Especially when the clause is usually worded something to the effect of “the buyer’s sole and uncontestable right to void the deal”.

        The lawyer doesn’t like the way the reserve fund study projects 25 years down the road…so now you are back to square one, with a property that has sold conditionally and then be back on the market.

        I’d rather have the peace of mind knowing that the deal is firm.

        1. Condodweller

          at 9:39 am

          This is one of those philosophical questions with contemplating. I think David has indicated before that he only had a few deals fall through based on conditions. He has done hundreds of deals over the years which makes it what, less than 1% of deals fall through? In an environment like today where you have a group of people salivating to buy your condo, even if the deal falls through, how difficult is it to go back to the pool of buyers and get a second deal to make it worthwhile to take a chance on a conditional offer?

          1. Steve

            at 11:57 am

            It’s less than 1% of deals for David, but if you’re the 1% seller who gets stuck it’s likely of much more impact to you.

          2. Condodweller

            at 1:46 pm

            It’s simple risk management. If I told you I would give you $20k after you spin a wheel with more than a hundred pegs for all cases except for one where is slap you in the face instead, would you take me up on my offer? Actually, to be more analogous you get to send your agent, and he gets the slap since it’s more work for him. You would just have to wait a little.

    2. Appraiser

      at 9:12 am

      As a percentage of the sale price, $20k is chump change on most transactions today.

      People sell for a reason.

      Selling firm represents an act of finality and the prospect of moving on with life. Often this aspect of the deal is a big motivator for many.

      1. Condodweller

        at 9:45 am

        I paid $20k for my house in the 1955. Explain to me why it is a good idea to leave $20k on the table for the off chance of having to go back to the next offer where I only have to give up the same amount or perhaps a little less?

        1. BC Realtor

          at 3:12 pm

          It’s not as “off” chance as you think Condodweller. Happens everyday of the week in my market. A certain segment of buyers get their conditional offers accepted then continue to “look for a better property” while their conditions are being satisfied. Find something they like better, they just don’t remove their “Subject to Finance” or “Subject to Lawyer approval” on the 1st home which leaves the home owner high & dry to do it all over again. What happens if the 1st Sellers have found the home of their dreams and have made a conditional offer “Subject to confirmation of their buyers subject removal”? The certainty of a firm deal with “attached deposit” is worth every dollar they might leave on the table.

  6. JT

    at 9:14 am

    I’d hate to be that guy, HOWEVER, maybe instead of using sarcasm to gloss over the Australian system which seems to be transparent and fair, you could consider researching their system and posting a blog comparing and contrasting that system with ours?

      1. marmota

        at 6:14 pm

        I feel you had that one ready to reply to the first comment that brought it up (instead of including it in the blog post from the get go…). Nicely done, sir!

      2. TJ

        at 6:19 pm

        From that blog post, you say:

        “And you even know the result for each property. Which sold at auction, which was withdrawn, which sold before or after the auction, and which was passed-in. So as a buyer, you know which properties are tied up, which are gone for good, and which might come back into play.”

        To me, that already sounds 100x better than what we have in Ontario – as a buyer, anyway (terrible for the seller of course). I was expecting to read a damning indictment of the Australian system at the end of the post but didn’t find any critical points from you other than the logistics of public auctions – post-Covid me shudders at that thought.

        So my question is, are you in favour of incorporating the auction model?

        1. Appraiser

          at 7:14 pm

          The auction model is perfectly legal and available in Canada. Just not very popular.

          1. TJ

            at 1:11 am

            Of course it’s not very popular – it’s a buyer-friendly approach. No seller wants transparency. But David said his 2018 post “destroyed the myth” of the “superior” system – nothing in his post comes remotely close to that.

          2. Dan Beloiu

            at 3:55 pm

            @TJ – the open auction is even worse. First of all, in order to have a a real bidding the rest of the criteria should be set, only the price to be flexible. That means you force everybody who wants to compete to go without conditions, same closing and same minimum deposit, right?
            Then exactly how do you imagine this is going to work when you have husband, wife and family behind them. 30 minutes increments and 5 hour long auction? Or everybody in a room and forced to increase the price with 20k in 2 minutes or they will loose the house?
            Our system is good enough but not used properly. A buyer who submits an offer is supposed to send his best and final offer, right? That means if he is willing to pay max 780 for the condo that is what he submits even if there are 2, 4 or 50 offers. In a normal world if he said his best offer is 780 he wouldn’t increase it when you go back to them.

        2. HighPark_Investor

          at 12:09 pm

          His point was that the auction system it’s not better, it’s just different. With it’s own set of strengths and weakness. If you’ve actually been to an auction, you should understand why.

          I think his underlying point is that underlist/bully/offer nights is the system we have, just deal with it.

          1. Batalha

            at 4:11 pm

            Excuse me, HPI, but TJ said “100x better than what we have in Ontario.” BETTER. He said BETTER. Not “different.”

        3. Batalha

          at 4:09 pm

          “To me, that already sounds 100x better than what we have in Ontario – as a buyer, anyway (terrible for the seller of course).”

          TJ, please explain why a system that is, in your own words, “100X better for the buyer” while being “terrible for the seller” (“of course”) is preferable???

          Societies have both buyers and sellers (duh!). Think about what you’re saying before spewing it out.

          1. TJ

            at 12:34 pm

            > Societies have both buyers and sellers (duh!)

            That’s right! Sellers hose the buyers right now, then they get hosed in return when they have to rebuy, say if they’re upsizing from a semi to a detached. A perfect circle of life, right? Not if you’re a FTHB trying to get in, and can’t rely on the comfort of hosing someone as a seller. It’s basically a ponzi scheme of continually screwing the FTHB.

            At any given time, in any given situation, the more transparency forced upon a transactional party is “unfair” to them. Do you think financial advisors enjoy disclosing their fees? Of course not. But they’re now forced to do it anyway, because regulators have recognized that the market is skewed too heavily to one side and the buyer needs to be given back some advantage to even the playing field. Other than a brief period in the DT condo market last year, when in the past 10 years haven’t sellers been able to vice-grip buyers by the balls?

            David’s conclusion is abundantly clear: “this system is fundamentally flawed but don’t complain because you’d do the exact same shit as a seller”. He’s not wrong, but it doesn’t mean that it’s the best way of doing this.

  7. hoob

    at 9:15 am

    tbh I was expecting more shenanigans and intrigue…

  8. Marty

    at 10:02 am

    I know it was not meant not be a humorous column at all, but this was my laugh (out loud!) point:

    > > I’m ready for your suggestions about how this all “should” work, or **how the system should be automated and run by the government**

    I have no questions.

  9. Serge

    at 10:45 am

    A great article David. Really enjoyed reading it.

    You are describing a real offer night scenario. I bought and sold a few properties in the last 5 years, and every time it played (give or take) by the script you’ve explained.

    If there was no way to add “conditions” on a price, I could imagine an automated system processing offers. But with conditions, there’s no easy alternative on the market – do you sell to a 750k no-condition offer, or to a 850k “conditional on inspection”? How do you tell good offers from bad ones? etc.

  10. Appraiser

    at 12:08 pm

    In a hot sellers market it matters very little what process is utilized to effect the sale. There can only be one winner.

    The losers are going to be disappointed, angry, suspicious and upset.

    1. J G

      at 4:49 pm

      Is the dead-cat still bouncing?

      1. Appraiser

        at 9:25 am

        Huh?

  11. Ed

    at 12:23 pm

    Glad it worked out but what if $765,000’s clients heard back that $780,000 was not going to do it and simply walked away?

  12. Edwin

    at 1:54 pm

    If the 765K offer came back at 800, but with conditions, what are you doing? Taking 50K less with no conditions, or just picking from the top two offers and hoping for the best?

  13. Mavis

    at 2:21 pm

    Interesting blog! In a situation like the one you described, could the seller just sign back the second highest unconditional offer at a higher selling price to get it closer to the highest bid? Do you think Ontario is likely to soon require disclosure of all the competing bids after the property is sold? I know there are many professional and ethical agents who run the bidding process fairly, but at the same time I’m sure it’s being manipulated all over the place by some.

  14. Bill

    at 2:40 pm

    Great article, I’m curious about the communication with your sellers in terms of the offers and the strategy. Has the strategy or multiple strategies planned out in advance or are some decisions being made right on the spot?

  15. Joel

    at 3:47 pm

    When pushing for 800K unconditional, do you and the sellers not concern yourselves about the financing?
    If that property doesn’t appraise and you know they don’t have the cash to put down, what is the plan then?

  16. R

    at 4:58 pm

    Let’s hear the other side from your perspective when you lose in a multiple offer situation!

  17. Chagit

    at 5:25 pm

    great post! thank you for the knowledge share and the laugh.
    have you ever wrote about co-ownerships would love to hear your take on this topic.

  18. Birjis Ishrat Rizvi

    at 9:03 pm

    Believe me, I had the same experience recently :))

  19. Tak Loo

    at 7:03 am

    Thanks for sharing and educating us David.

    Who owns the data about number of offers ? Can that be made public, perhaps even in real time as the offers are registered?

  20. Does no one have an issue with this?

    at 8:32 am

    So the guy who actually has the best offer at $765K bids against himself and increases his offer to $800K because he’s led to believe that he needs a better offer to “win” when in fact he didn’t. It was a lie IMO.

    This is the problem with the system. This is why many people blame “agents and the system” for increasing house prices.

    1. Condodweller

      at 10:13 am

      Why is $765k the best? Someone has signed a contract and is willing to pay you $791k. If David knows there’s nothing wrong with the status, and less than 1% chance of the deal not firming up (see my other comment above) to me the $791k is the best offer.

      My biggest issue with this scenario is where the top three are sent back to “improve” their offer. In this case my offer would be $26k higher and you expect me to improve it?! That should not be allowed.
      BTW, I’d be much more suspicious as the buyer if the seller asks me to remove a condition from my offer and I would have a lot more to lose if there is a problem with status. So I am being asked to take on a significant risk to make the seller more comfortable and help him sleep better for a week.

      1. Does no one have an issue with this?

        at 2:24 pm

        because the $791K offer was conditional… David said himself its would never get accepted.

        1. Condodweller

          at 3:51 pm

          Actually, what he said was that ” no way they’d accept” it, and other agents would agree. That sounds great but what if next time he can’t get a higher unconditional offer. What if, as the other person asked, there is $50k between the highest conditional and the next highest unconditional offer? Is it a hard no on conditional offers and the owners should just pretend it never happened? Doesn’t the owner get a say in this?

          1. ARW

            at 7:32 pm

            I “lost” a bid on a place that went for $25k under what I offered. I had an inspection condition, with 48 hours to clear it. I didn’t have time before the offer date & felt like an inspection was warranted on this particular property.

    2. Libertarian

      at 10:50 am

      I agree. I’ve been saying this for years on this blog. By suggesting the buyers improve their bid, and the buyers going up to $800K, now the next condo that goes up for sale will use $800K as the guide even though the majority of the offers were below $750K.

      But the response is always “this system is better than Australia,” as per TJ’s comments above (or is it JT?).

      Even a couple of weeks ago, I wrote that I’m surprised that the real estate industry in this country hasn’t been proactive about tweaking the process to earn some goodwill with the public.

      There has to be a sweet spot between the blind auction system we have and Australia’s open auction system.

      1. TJ

        at 11:55 am

        I’m not JT but it’s a funny coincidence. I still don’t understand what’s so bad about the Australian system other than that it forces transparency upon sellers and reduces their ability to bend over buyers.

        1. Thomas

          at 7:49 pm

          Nothing is better than TO RE

    3. Tak Loo

      at 8:32 pm

      When you put it that way, it makes sense!

  21. AK

    at 8:51 am

    Hmm… I wonder… if those agents aren’t registering because they know they may not have the strongest offer so they bid late without registering, hoping a more strong hand doesn’t see “25 registered offers” at 7pm and way over bid them.

    Also I wonder how this would have played out had their been a material difference higher with a conditional offer.

  22. Keith Tripp

    at 12:28 pm

    Interesting article for someone who just finished going through the buying expereimce with family members. I am also a home inspector ( remember when people used to do those before buying!) Just a format comment, on the version I am reading the author is not identified. Until the comments section, where there is a reply from David Fleming, I had no idea who had written this article.

  23. Thomas

    at 7:57 pm

    On offer date, the best hustler wins. And the odds are stacked against buyers. You could write a three part series about it but it boils down to hustling and that is all there to it. It is sad to see that hustling is what Canadian economy depends on!

  24. Jessica Small

    at 6:19 am

    I was cured of herpes simplex virus, I am so happy, The Doctor’s email ____________________________Robinsonbuckler11 @ {{gmail}} com…………

  25. jeanmarc

    at 1:14 pm

    I have been through this process 4 times in the past 10 years. Twice as a seller and twice as a buyer. And I have taken a bunch of those RE courses so nothing surprises here when it comes to “no rules or regulations” once the listing agent has the “x” amount of offers on the table. Sucks to be the buyer when there are multiple bids and you have no idea where your offer lands or how much more you need to go to get the property.

  26. Mike

    at 6:16 am

    Isn’t the job of the real estate agent to appraise the property correctly (under the current market conditions)? If the property is worth 800K wouldn’t it better to list it for 800K? Probably you’d get 2-3 offers and save a lot of time and frustration for other agents and buyers?

  27. Pingback: Top Five: Blog Posts Of 2021 - Finance Library
  28. John Chang

    at 11:33 am

    What is this word vomit

    Stop taking adderall you lunatic

Pick5 is a weekly series comparing and analyzing five residential properties based on price, style, location, and neighbourhood.

Search Posts